Change: If you are working in a team a good tool for monitoring can be regular programme team reflection sessions, facilitated and prepared by one staff   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 2753)

Change:  seems most useful for in connection with the so far described steps in PME&L. Below is a version of Outcome Mapping’s outcome journal that has   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 2383)

Change: prepared by asking all team members to use self-assessment tools or alternatively by asking them to identify the most significant changes that have taken place within the programme. Such sessions can easily also be criticallyconducted consideredwith aspartners well.and techniques for both self-assessment   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 1450)

Change: (Implementation) monitoring planMonitoring focus:Result (on different levels: outcome, output)IndicatorsMeans of Verification/Information source/Data collection toolFrequency of data collectionWho collects data?With this plan, the collection of data can be organised. This is, however,   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 1385)

Change: A good monitoring system helps to inform day-to-day decision making and helps to ensure that decisions and activities are moving towards expected results. At the   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 1273)

Change: Doing monitoring is based on the steps described earlier throughout this resource kit, namely: Theories of Change, results chains, indicators and baseline study. The results   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 789)

Change: Created by chachabooth May 15 2009, 7:39 AM EDT for: no reason given